Categories
Car restoration services

Opinions June 27, 2022 – Indiana Lawyer

Courtroom of Appeals of IndianaAnthony Malone v. State of Indiana21A-CR-2380Felony. Affirms Anthony Malone’s combination 21-yr sentence for reckless homicide, a Diploma 5 felony, and an enhancement for Using a firearm Inside the fee of the offense. Finds the St. Joseph Superior Courtroom Did no…….

Courtroom of Appeals of Indiana
Anthony Malone v. State of Indiana
21A-CR-2380
Felony. Affirms Anthony Malone’s combination 21-yr sentence for reckless homicide, a Diploma 5 felony, and an enhancement for Using a firearm Inside the fee of the offense. Finds the St. Joseph Superior Courtroom Did not abuse its discretion at sentencing. Additionally finds Malone’s sentence Isn’t inappropriate.

State of Indiana v. Tala M. Jones
21A-CR-2254
Felony. Reverses the Wayne Superior Courtroom’s suppression of suspected heroin and cocaine however affirms the denial of Tala Jones’ request to suppress the suspected marijuana Current in her automotive. Finds any violation of Jones’ proper to be free from self-incrimination beneath the Fifth Modification or Article 1, Part 14 of the Indiana Structure Did not require suppression of the bodily fruits of that violation. Additionally finds the search of Jones’ car violated neither her federal nor her state constitutional propers to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. Remands for trial. 

Tevin B.S. Attkisson v. State of Indiana
21A-CR-2659
Felony. Affirms Tevin B.S. Attkisson’s conviction for theft whereas armed with a lethal weapon as a Diploma 3 felony and his sentence to 16 yrs, with 14 yrs executed On the Indiana Division of Correction and two yrs suspended to probation. Finds the Elkhart Circuit Courtroom Did not abuse its discretion by admitting proof of an uncharged offense pursuant to Indiana Evidence Rule 404(b)(2) To decide Attkisson’s id. Additionally finds the state launched enough proof past An Low price doubt To decide that Attkisson was armed with a lethal weapon. Lastly, finds Attkisson’s sentence Isn’t inappropriate in mild of the offense and his character.

Michael Anthony Thompson v. …….

Source: https://www.theindianalawyer.com/articles/opinions-june-27-2022